In today's article we discuss why we believe this new bull-market is rapidly turning into a bubble.

Share This Post

One can debate whether the current asset bubble is likely to burst anytime soon, but one cannot deny that a bubble is starting to emerge. This statement should not be mistaken for a warning of impeding market collapse, it is not. Our clients have been 100% invested since October, heavily overweight equities, and have remained fully invested over the past 3 months. Despite the timing of this article, I currently have a particularly bullish outlook, and since October have been positioned more aggressively personally than I have in years.

Yet it is important to acknowledge the financial environment we are in. Coincidentally, it has been just over a year since we published our market warning to seek cover ahead of what we believed was an inevitable pandemic-induced correction. The financial market backdrop today could not possibly be more different. Last February we predicted that the market was about to collapse; this February we believe the market is going to continue to melt up for the foreseeable future.

Where are we now?

Let us paint a picture of where we are today relative to a year ago: The tech-heavy Nasdaq index is 43% higher than it was at its pre-pandemic peak. A lot of that is easily reconciled with companies such as Shopify having been catapulted through about 5 years’ worth of growth in the space of 12 months. Fair enough, how about small caps? The Russel 2000 Index (the aggregate of 2000 small cap US companies) is more reflective of the real economy. It is 35% higher than it was pre-pandemic. That should raise one or two eyebrows. It includes companies that have had their normal business virtually shut down for the better part of a year. Now, consider for a minute the number of Starbucks coffees you used to consume on a weekly basis, and then count how many you’ve had this year. Yet Starbucks’ share price is 30% higher than it was a year ago. MGM which derives the majority of its revenues from its resorts in Las Vegas was trading at 32 pre-pandemic, and 36 as of yesterday (off the back of horrific financial results, as the business is operating nowhere near capacity). There are even more extreme examples: Tesla, which is a “lightning rod for speculation” (to borrow a phrase from one of my favorite market commentators) is up 450% in a year. There is no point analyzing metrics, there is no measure by which Tesla can be considered 5 times more valuable than it was a year ago. Yet it is. Perhaps it would be fairer to look at the polar opposite of Tesla? One could argue that is crude oil, possibly the least popular and politically most inflammatory substance on the planet. The price of crude was 52 before the pandemic. It went negative during the crisis. It is 57 today. I think you get the picture.

What caused this Covid-Bubble?

The rally we have seen extends far beyond stocks and debt and is now flooding through commodities, property, crypto currency and virtually any other asset class one can think of. It is vital for us to be clear on the fact that this is the biggest all-encompassing asset rally of all time. And it is entirely attributable to central bank action. That may sound simplistic, and sure there are nuances to it, but they hardly matter. Some argue that markets are looking through to future economic recovery. Others say it makes sense for prices to rebound given we now know Covid will be dealt with. That hardly justifies many companies being worth more than they were before Covid despite undeniably having worse businesses now. The stark reality is 90% of economies are in worse shape (GDP, employment, debt) than they were a year ago. Between the Fed, ECB, PBC, BOE and BoJ alone more than 10 trillion dollars have been added to the system. You don’t need to look any further than that to understand what has driven this surge in prices. You could also just plot any equity index against the M2 money supply, and you’ll quickly realize what is driving price appreciation. We are in a zero-interest rate environment with millions of investors chasing yield, and trillions of dollars of excess liquidity in the system. On top of it, retail investing has exploded over the past year.

How does one generally classify a bubble?

A bubble is typically defined as rapid price escalation of an asset due to accommodative monetary conditions. It is typically formed by a surge in valuations driven by exuberant market behavior. Asset prices then massively exceed the intrinsic value implied by fundamentals. I refuse to apply each aspect of the definition of a bubble to the current situation, because it is almost uncanny how textbook the current example is. There has never been a better example of a bubble. The ‘99 dotcom bubble was fairly contained, in that it mainly affected internet startups (by all metrics the current environment is as extreme). The GFC (Global Financial Crisis) was initially caused by rapid price escalation in US property markets, due to loose monetary policy and excessive credit. Bubbles are rarely created without the presence of highly accommodative monetary policy. I think 10 trillion dollars of liquidity, 0% interest rates, and helicopter money probably just about meet the definition of “accommodative”. If you choose not to label the current environment as a bubble, then you really need to lobby for a change to the definition of a bubble. That being said, we do not believe that this trend is going to reverse in the next few months.

Do bubbles always burst?

Short answer: Yes. The million-dollar question however is WHEN. We don’t think it’s imminent, and that is important. But to answer this question properly we really need to understand WHAT causes bubbles to burst. There is quite an overlap historically in which factors contribute towards bursting a bubble. Falling demand is one. In some ways the dotcom bubble burst because investors eventually realized that 95% of dotcoms were never going to turn a profit. Suddenly there were thousands of startups and nobody left to invest in them. You could potentially also call that an increase in supply. A better example of excessive supply is 2008. The demand for property certainly didn’t fade as quickly as supply increased. The market got saturated. Of course, the supply-demand curve suddenly shifting is in itself often not enough to cause a bubble to burst. In 2008 many years of excess credit and expanding supply finally only exploded once monetary conditions changed too quickly. Specifically, the rates on certain mortgages reset at a higher rate which quickly caused contagion into other asset classes. Within a few months you had a massive oversupply of properties that there was no demand for, underpinned by debt which could no longer be serviced. The GFC that emerged from it was eventually solved through an easing of monetary policy (the very thing that can lead to market exuberance). Rates were dropped to zero, and money was printed in order to ensure that the entire financial system wouldn’t collapse. Various institutions were bailed out through TARP (The Fed’s Troubled Asset Relief Program) which was authorized for upto 700bn (only 500bn was spent in the end). At the time most people, including my peers, were horrified at the prospect of printing nearly a trillion dollars of money in order to bail out a bunch of banks so that we could save the monetary system. Well, the scary thing is very few people today seem to be batting an eyelid at the fact that we have printed about 20 times as much money fighting Covid as we did dealing with the GFC. It took the better part of a decade to undo some of the damage of the GFC, and interest rates barely ever increased again.

If you haven’t been worried about the insane amounts of money flooding the system, you probably should be. It’s the elephant in the room. Nobody knows exactly how this is going to end. And again, this isn’t a sell warning right now, in fact our clients are currently actively involved. However, at some point the only remedy for dialing back trillions of dollars of liquidity is tightening monetary policy, as well as massively tightening fiscal policy. This mess needs to be paid for by the economically active through: Increased taxes, higher retirement ages, and higher inflation (inflation erodes debt). The bad news is it is unlikely to take only 10 years to fix this time round.

When will the Covid-Bubble burst?

It is difficult to put an exact timeline on this, but it seems only logical that the party will have to end when one of 2 things happen:

  1. Supply increases to an unsustainable level: Unfortunately, this is like asking how long a piece of string is. Property markets suffer from excess supply when thousands of physical properties stand empty. The Covid-Bubble has unlimited supply in the sense that it encompasses every asset class, but worse, many of these asset classes have no upside limit. If Tesla can rally 500% in a year to a share-price of 900, then why can it not rally to 2000? Or 5000? The consensus right now is about 1200, and there are some respected analysts predicting 2000. Every valuation metric for Tesla didn’t make sense at 500, so why should anything change at 1200? A more extreme example is an asset class where the most experienced experts cannot value it fundamentally at all: Bitcoin. There is no valid argument to make for valuing Bitcoin at 5000, 50,000 or 500,000. So in short, supply could increase perpetually. In my opinion an increase in supply is not what is going to burst this bubble.
  2. A reversal of accommodative monetary policy: I believe this is the only thing that can, and will cause the Covid-Bubble to burst eventually. As I write this lawmakers are getting ready to unveil the next stimulus package in the US, 1.4tn (or maybe it will be 1.9tn, what’s half a trillion in the grand scheme of things, right?). Right now there is no limit to what central banks will do, however there will come a time when the focus has to shift from spending to tightening. It could be in 6 months, or it could be in 2 years. Looking at the UK it is quite clear that the emphasis has shifted from spending to increasing taxes. Once the pandemic is deemed “under control” governments will have to let economic realities sink in. Obviously, this comes with massive timing differences in various asset classes and regions. The only guarantee then (as always) is those assets that rallied the most will sell-off first, and the hardest.

It is worth circling point 2) back to the GFC for a minute. The GFC undoubtedly started due to the unravelling of the subprime crisis. There was a very localized acute increase in rates in certain vintages of subprime due to the resettable nature of those particular mortgages. When those resets hit, it was like a domino effect that could no longer be stopped. You can’t stop what is legally documented in millions of mortgages. One could argue that if these instruments had been restructured the subprime bubble could have continued for a few years. This is important, because the situation today is quite different. Central banks are sitting directly at the joystick this time – they are blatantly aware that drastically changing monetary conditions would be detrimental to the system, so they are clearly not going to hit the big red button. I think it is highly unlikely central banks are prepared to cause a market sell-off at the same time that we are still fighting this pandemic. There is probably even an argument to be made that if the market were to correct by 10% they are likely to add even more stimulus. So it all really comes down to the question of how long can that trend continue. In the meantime it really is a case of “make hay while the sun shines”. I don’t see anything significant changing in the next 2-3 months.

What does one do about this?

We should start by acknowledging the true state of the environment we’re in. It is idealistic to assume that the world is dealing with this pandemic so effectively that the global economy is flourishing, and that this is in turn being reflected in the strength of financial markets. But at the same time, it is probably a bad idea to sit on the sidelines and do nothing while every asset class on earth is rallying. Here are a few pointers from real conversations I’ve recently had with clients, peers and friends:

  1. Avoid large cash balances. Interest rates are zero or negative and inflation is increasing. Cash earning nothing will erode your wealth. Central banks are signaling that they will not increase rates in response to increases in inflation (i.e. they are deviating from their primary mandate). Governments desperately need inflation as inflation is one of the few things that can erode this mountain of debt.
  2. If you want to participate in markets, then only speculate with money that you can afford to lose. When valuations are at these levels it is fairly easy to suffer large losses in a short space of time. Invest in themes that ultimately have longer-term fundamental merit.
  3. Diversify into real assets. Protect yourself against inflation, which is a certainty at this point (not many other things are). Property is always a good asset to hedge against inflation, provide stable returns and access leverage. Property markets have gone up in most parts of the world, but they haven’t rallied as aggressively as equity markets. If you are going to chase assets, chase those that react slower to market exuberance.
  4. Be disciplined. The investment world, in particular retail, has a serious case of YOLO and FOMO right now. When every serious financial expert you know tells you that the price of GameStop WILL come crashing down, listen to them. Almost everything is rallying right now which makes it tempting to jump in head first, but even in this environment there are trades that one quite obviously needs to stay away from.
  5. Don’t be afraid of debt. I am not referring to credit card debt here – I am referring to cheap debt, underpinned by tangible assets. Governments and the biggest corporations on the planet are benefitting from low interest rates; you should be aligned with them. If you can borrow at 1% to invest in stable assets that generate 5%, you should be doing it. While money printing is guaranteed to stop at some point, low interest rates will be here for years, if not decades. If inflation erodes the value of government debt, it will do the same to the value of your debt.
  6. Get comfortable with the fact that taxes are going to increase in most parts of the world and put more effort into being efficient in that regard. Taxes are one of the few tools that governments have  at their disposal to deal with this mess. Spend time on setting up the right vehicles for your assets and revenue streams. Be smart about maximising the benefits of your SIPPs and ISAs.

This is an exciting time to be an investor, but it is also one of the most challenging market environments we have ever seen. If you have any questions or would like to enquire about more tailored advice please contact us via the website.

12 thoughts on “The Covid-Bubble”

  1. You mention property is usually in bubble territory when thousands of properties stand empty without buyers for them. If that’s the case why hasn’t the Chinese property market collapsed? There are entire cities full of empty apartments there.

    • Thanks Liz – this is honestly a brilliant question. China’s property market isn’t in a particularly healthy state anyway. If you browse news most of the articles are about bubble concerns. However, the bubble clearly hasn’t burst. We said above increased supply can be a cause. But China has extremely tight property regulations, and actively manages supply. They have no problem building 10s of thousands of condos (entire cities as you say) in order to get the economic catalysts of building and spending. If there is too much supply, they quite simply take it off the market. China frequently restricts the selling of property in an extremely interventionist way. It’s another thing China is able to do which the rest of the world is not. If there is an over-supply of property in London developers slash prices and try to get stock out the door. But in China that supply is controlled centrally. There is no issue having 10s of thousands of empty properties with no bid, as long as nothing is trading. As and when properties are needed they turn the tap on and off. It’s actually pretty smart, but also not surprising given its a 50 trillion dollar market (real estate is a massive 20% of Chinese GDP). They just can’t afford for that market to collapse.

  2. You mentioned GameStop – so are you saying GameStop was just another example of a bubble? Retail investors want to get involved and too many people buy the same thing? How does one know what to avoid then?

    • GameStop (Nokia, Blackberry, and many others) are a different case. They are extremely short-term bubbles, but they emerge for different reasons. In the case of GameStop a group of retail investors (now fairly well known) actually collaborated in order to drive the price of the share up (highly illegal btw, but almost impossible to police). They were far more sophisticated than most people gave them credit for. The specifically targeted companies with large short-selling interest in them. What that means is investors that have shorted a stock will have to “buy back” their short later on. If you drive the price up, those investors (in this case hedge funds) have to buy back at a higher price, that in turn causes the price to jump even more. It’s a classic short squeeze. Short squeezes are frequent (the biggest one before GameStop was VW in 2008.

      Of course GameStop would have been a great stock to jump in on early if you could get the timing right. The problem was the entire strategy was (and still is) to never sell in order to keep the stock elevated. But it is impossible to prevent a group of retail investors from taking profits. By the time GameStop went to 300 (fairly quickly) it was clear one needed to stay away. GameStop is not a 25 billion dollar company in any realm. I was asked about GameStop about 20 times in the space of a week and my reply was always a resounding “stay away”. The stock is now back down to 51 and it will not end there. It will eventually settle in the 10-20 range. Anyone with real financial market experience knows this. The notion of buying at 50 thinking it could go back to 400 is pure insanity at this point.

        • Yes in theory that is a great trade. But you need to have the stomach for it (if you’re retail) or the risk limits if you’re an institution. When GME went to 300 it still had more than 100% of its floating stock shorted, which means it was likely to keep being squeezed in the short term. So if you’re a retail investor and you short 10,000 dollars at 300 – you are faced with the prospect of that 10,000 being worth 5000 one day later if GME goes to 600. That’s pretty easy to handle (although most retail investors don’t like losing 50% of their capital in a few hours). But if you’re an institution, specifically a hedge fund, you need risk limits. If you put 100 million down on a trade like that and 2 hours later you’ve lost 50 million your CIO is not going to be happy, particularly when 2 hedge funds just got blown up on the same trade that week. So if you are going to short something you have to be absolutely certain you have the buffer to ride it out. Taking a 2 month short-view on GME at 300 was the closest thing there is to a sure thing I’ve seen in a long time (btw – I didn’t short it, I was too slow, and I try not to get distracted by these things).

          I can guarantee you that there were some extremely ballsy funds out there that shorted GME at 300-400 and made a killing.

  3. Thanks for the article Greg. I have been reading these for about a year now and find that they really summarise the big picture pretty well. You hadn’t published anything since before the election and I actually went back to look at your reply to my comment saying you were fairly certain there would be riots but come inauguration day Biden will be president!

    Minor criticism however: You have clearly been saying one should be invested since October but I find it hard to determine in exactly what. Do you have any specific recommendations?

    • Hi Emma – I remember! When I said riots I certainly didn’t envisage the capitol riots!

      Point taken – if you send me your email address I’ll send you some more details. It is difficult (and sometimes ill advised) giving even high level investment advice to individuals without assessing their risk profile. But for any investor who wants to “ride the wave” right now these are the main themes I am focusing on (and currently my personal pension comprises these funds/ETFs): Tech (QQQ, Polar Capital), Global Equity (Fundsmith), China (Baillie Gifford China), Japan (Legg Mason Japan Equity), Biotech (AXA Framligton Biotech), Mining (BRWM) and renewable energy (INRG, ICLN, Kensho).
      *** Please be aware that these are by no means conservative investments and should not indepdently be viewed as advice. I would prefer to have a more detailed chat. I’m happy to put these out there as I am bringing out a follow up article on Investment Themes for 2021 shorrtly.

  4. How does one enter this market? I have been reluctant to invest cash and have been watching the market run away over the last 9 months now. Some are saying this is start of a new bull-market (in which case I should be jump in), others like yourself are warning that things are getting a heated, but seem to be investing anyway. Any advice?

    • Hi Dino – coming into the market immediately after any rally is always tough. There are millions of investors who unwound their portfolios in March and never came back in because the market ran away. Over the last few days I’ve had prospective trades that have run away from my before I had time to write them down. It’s daunting investing at a time when you feel like the next sell-off should be imminent. I have a few suggestions:
      – Average in, if you’re investing 100k, do 20k a week for the next month, you get to participate immediately if the rally continues, but you have the chance to buy on dips with your remaining cash if there’s a sell-off
      – Come up with the portfolio/allocation that you would want to continue holding if you were already invested. Any investor who is fully invested right now has the option of staying put, or getting out – for you it’s no different really, you’re just starting later on but continuing to HOLD EasyJet at 800, is effectively the same as choosing to buy it at 800.
      – Buy on dips – when single stocks are this volatile, the next dip is always around the corner. Track the stocks you want daily and wait until they have a bigger than average pull-back, it will come
      – The same goes for structured products or anything where you’re selling vol. Don’t sell vol when the VIX has been grinding lower. Just 2 weeks ago it touched 35 and today it went to 19 – this is not the time to sell vol. Figure out what you want to do, wait for a spike and then pull the trigger quickly
      – If you’re worried about investing in stock that have had meteoric rises over the last 6 months on an outright basis you could look at structures around those stocks. Index vol is low, but single stock vol on some names is through the roof – selling vol on that can make sense

      Feel free to contact us via the website if you want to discuss anything in more detail

      • Also Dino, just to add one thing. You mentioned that some are calling this a bullmarket. This absolutely is a bullmarket, by definition. We’ve been in bullmarket territory for a while now and it is a particularly aggressive one. And nobody can say for sure if it’s the start of a long bullmarket or if it will misfire. My article talks about how there are elements of over heating in particular in certain asset classes, but there certainly is a strong narrative for this being the start of a long covid-recovery driven bullmarket. Doing nothing, and sitting on cash, could be as painful as having some portfolio volatility

Comments are closed.

READ MORE

Share This Post

Subscribe to our mailing list